The Arctic This Week Take Five: Week of 16 June, 2025

Back to Publications

Updates to U.S. Strategy in Greenland

As reported by Defense News on June 17, the U.S. Department of Defense confirmed the transfer of operational control of Pituffik Space Base in Greenland from U.S. European Command (EUCOM) to U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM). The move places oversight of U.S. military activities in Greenland to a command structure responsible for homeland defense and continental missile warning systems to align Arctic operations with Northern Command’s strategic focus. (Defense News)

Take 1: This command shift signals a deepening focus of the Trump Administration on the Arctic as an extension of continental defense. NORTHCOM’s remit includes ballistic missile warning and homeland protection, which are necessary functions for Greenland’s geography. Pituffik is home to a key satellite and radar hub for missile tracking, meaning this reassignment could allow more direct integration of Arctic assets into the U.S. strategic defense grid. The move can also be interpreted as carrying a symbolic weight: pulling Greenland away from a European-aligned command structure could be perceived as a bid to ‘Americanize’ Arctic governance, which will likely contribute to rising tensions with Denmark and the EU, more broadly. For Greenland, the shift may reinforce longstanding concerns about being treated as a strategic asset rather than a political actor with its own agency, especially in light of longstanding calls for Greenlandic independence and renewed U.S. interest in Greenlandic territory and resources. Regionally, within the context of growing NATO and Russian military activity in the Arctic, command realignments such as this are one way states signal intent. Compounding this shift, the public confirmation by Defense Secretary Hegseth of U.S. contingency plans for operations in Greenland marks an aggressive, politically charged admission. For Greenland, these moves may validate long-held fears of being a buffer state caught between great powers. Together, these events underscore how U.S. Arctic strategy is diverging from that of its allies. (Air and Space Forces, AP News, PBS News)

Macron Visits Greenland Amid Sovereignty Tensions

As reported by BBC on June 15, French President Emmanuel Macron visited Nuuk, Greenland, where he met with Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte B. Egede and Danish officials. Macron reaffirmed European support for Greenland’s autonomy and announced plans to open a French consulate in Nuuk. The visit was made at the invitation of Greenlandic and Danish authorities. (BBC)

Take 2: Macron’s visit constitutes a high-profile demonstration of European diplomatic alignment in the Arctic. Though France is not an Arctic state, it does play a not insubstantial role in EU Arctic affairs and is an observer on the Arctic Council. His choice to travel to Nuuk and deliver remarks supporting Greenland’s self-determination sends a clear message to both Washington and Moscow, that the EU sees Greenland not as a territory up for grabs but as a partner in Arctic governance. The visit comes at a sensitive moment as Greenland navigates its status as a semi-autonomous region while seeking more independence from Denmark and fielding threats from the U.S. Macron’s presence lends legitimacy to Greenlandic agency and could embolden efforts to assert a more distinct foreign policy voice. Crucially, the visit was not just symbolic as Macron took the opportunity to announce that France will open a consulate in Nuuk and is prepared to participate in joint Arctic exercises. These commitments reflect France’s intent to play a more active role in regional affairs, both diplomatically and strategically. They also underscore the value Europe places on governance norms and partnership in the Arctic, contrasting with more unilateral or militarized approaches. As France deepens its investments in polar research, infrastructure, and climate collaboration, Greenland’s cooperation becomes increasingly vital. (France24, High North News)

New Security Talks Between Denmark, Greenland & the Faroe Islands

As reported by High North News on June 18, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen met with leaders from Greenland and the Faroe Islands in the Faroe Islands for high-level talks on regional security. The discussions focused on civil preparedness, defense cooperation, and dual-use infrastructure development, such as ports. Denmark committed to increased security-related investments and pledged to strengthen preparedness across all three parts of the Kingdom of Denmark. The meeting was the first Arctic-focused security consultation among the three governments this year. (High North News)

Take 3: This trilateral security dialogue underscores the growing internal recognition within the Danish Realm that Arctic defense now demands a cohesive and inclusive strategy that respects the political agency of Greenland and the Faroe Islands. By convening and showing unity, the three leaders are signaling a shift from Denmark acting unilaterally to a more federated, consultative approach. For the Arctic, this demonstrates how middle powers are adapting governance structures under rising geopolitical pressure, including a tangible response to threats, both military and civil (e.g., infrastructure resilience, search-and-rescue, cybersecurity), which affect the Arctic’s environment. Joint investment in dual-use assets like ports and drones is emblematic of a new era where every piece of infrastructure can serve both strategic and civilian needs, deepening integration across the Kingdom’s territories and reinforcing sovereignty. By including both Greenland and the Faroes, these discussions also elevate their roles from more peripheral observers to more substantive partners. This shift aligns with mounting pressures for greater Greenlandic autonomy and the threat posed by external actors who might bypass Copenhagen. Here, demonstrating unity within the Kingdom sends a strong message to the U.S. and Russia that Scandinavian Arctic governance is cooperative and cohesive. This collaboration, though within one kingdom, could set a template for Arctic governance more broadly with small-state resilience bolstered through collective agency, and it may well inform how other Arctic nations consider the structuring of their own internal security arrangements. (High North News, High North News)

Norwegian Monarchs Visit to Svalbard

As reported by Eye on the Arctic on June 16, Norway’s King Harald V and Queen Sonja visited Longyearbyen, Svalbard, to mark the centenary of the 1925 Svalbard Act, which formalized Norwegian sovereignty over the archipelago. The visit included ceremonies and meetings with local officials, and stops at research and cultural institutions. The visit also included a visit to Mine 7, Svalbard’s last operating mine, which is to be closed at the end of the month. (EOTA)

Take 4: The Norwegian monarchs’ visit to Svalbard not just a ceremonial anniversary but a carefully timed assertion of sovereignty at a moment of mounting international scrutiny and strategic competition in the Arctic. By marking the centenary of the 1925 Svalbard Act, the visit reinforces Norway’s long-standing legal and political control over the archipelago, even as countries like Russia and China grow more assertive in contesting or circumventing the region’s demilitarized governance regime. Svalbard occupies a uniquely sensitive position in Arctic geopolitics. While the 1920 Svalbard Treaty grants Norway sovereignty, it also allows equal economic access to all signatories, and prohibits military activity. Russia continues to operate a coal mining settlement in Barentsburg, while China has expressed scientific and logistical interest in Svalbard. In this context, Norway’s highly visible reaffirmation of control through royal presence and public ceremony serves as a clear form of geopolitical signaling. Their visit to Mine 7, soon to be phased out, also serves as a symbolic farewell to Norway’s coal legacy in the Arctic and signals a pivot toward new scientific, environmental, and strategic priorities on the archipelago. In this light, the Norwegian monarchy’s visit demonstrates how even longstanding Arctic stakeholders must actively maintain visibility and legitimacy in the rapidly evolving politics of the circumpolar north. (ArcticPortal, High North News, The Barents Observer)

Arctic Peatlands Expand

As reported by Mirage News on June 19, a study published in Communications Earth & Environment found that Arctic peatlands in Europe and Canada have expanded over the past 40 years. Led by researchers at the University of Exeter, the study used satellite imagery, drones, and field observations to document increased plant growth at the edges of existing peatlands. The researchers attribute this growth to a warming climate, which has lengthened growing seasons and enhanced plant productivity. (Mirage News)

Take 5: The recent expansion of Arctic peatlands, as documented by the University of Exeter, underscores the complex interplay between climate change and carbon dynamics in the region. Historically, Arctic peatlands have acted as significant carbon sinks as they can store vast amounts of carbon dioxide and methane. However, the observed growth in these ecosystems suggests only a temporary increase in carbon sequestration capacity. This phenomenon is primarily due to extended growing seasons and enhanced plant growth facilitated by rising temperatures. Despite the short-term benefits, scientists are cautioning that widespread continued warming still poses a significant risk. As temperatures rise further, these peatlands may transition from carbon sinks to carbon sources. The thawing of permafrost and changes in moisture conditions could lead to the release of stored greenhouse gases, particularly methane. This release could accelerate climate change, and result in a feedback loop that exacerbates warming. The findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive climate policies that consider the dynamic nature of Arctic ecosystems, and increased monitoring and preservation of peatlands, as they are crucial to mitigating potential carbon emissions and are important ecosystems. Furthermore, these developments emphasize the importance of international cooperation in Arctic research and conservation efforts, as what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. As the Arctic continues to warm at an unprecedented rate, understanding and managing its carbon dynamics will be pivotal in global climate change mitigation strategies. (Nature, The Guardian)